Honda CX 500 Forum banner

CX500 VS CB900

9.1K views 15 replies 12 participants last post by  RAFster122s  
#1 ·
The insurance company is claiming my ’81 CX 500 Deluxe a total loss
Image
and we’ve come to an agreement on the value. This is the first bike I’ve had in about 20 years. It was a small project when I got it last Feb and I did all the work (with help) to get it ready for the road. I really like this bike
Image
I felt that it was comfortable and simple enough that I could fix anything that needed to be fixed on it. However, with the damage it sustained it is time for it to be replaced.
Image
Image


There are a few CXs in my area that I have been thinking of replacing my bike with (one Deluxe and a few Customs) but there is also an ’80 CB 900 that looks like it is in good road ready condition that could be had for the same amount of cash. This is a great forum with a wealth of information. I’d hate to buy the CB 900 and regret in a month not getting a CX. I’ve ridden my Deluxe almost everyday since I’ve gotten the plates for it (up untill I was sandwiched anyways). I am realy missing my ridding and looking forward to getting another bike.



What are the pros and cons of the CB 900 VS the CX 500. I’m mostly concerned about reliability, handling, and MPG.
 
#4 ·
Sorry to hear about the loss of your CX John. That is awful. I don't have experience with the CB900. I do with other lesser cc'd CB's of similar vintage and they've been great in performance and reliability. Very different feel than the CX. Going along with Rick-a-d having more lungs does complicate maintenance and probably the wallet for parts and fuel. Good luck with your search.
 
#5 ·
My brother had a cb900 custom, all decked out. He loved it. Only reason he moved it was that he had a Kawasaki concours and a nighthawk(or two)and several firebirds...you get the picture. His wife liked the ride on the Kawi so it stayed. That 900 was a sweet bike, tho.
 
#6 ·
More power, 10 speed trans, which will probably return the same gas mileage, and a decent amount more weight.



Both are 80s bikes, and neither will handle well compared to a modern non-cruiser. The CX will be most likely be much more nimble at slow speeds, but less fun on the highway.



Do you ride on the highway a lot?



I dont know much about their reliability, and the CX is definitely more unique (and in my humble opinion) way cooler.
 
#8 ·
The CB900s are a good bike AFAIK.I've known a few owners over the years but they are of course more complicated to work on and are as long in the tooth(Old versions) as the CXs.The servicing would most likely cost more and I'm not sure the spares are as easily available.



You already know what you are getting with a CX and plenty of back up
Image




My 2 cents
Image




PS

Out of the modern V twins I like the Suzuki SV650s,



http://motors.shop.ebay.com/Motorcy...v650&_catref=1&_dmpt=Motorcycles_Parts_Accessories&_trksid=p3286.c0.m282&_rdc=1
 
#10 ·
This. They can be found in the $2000-3000 range. A little more than your looking for, but certainly worth it. More power, less weight, no valves to adjust (although it does have a chain, but they arent nearly as bad as some of the folks here make them out to be), and its newer.



If I had some money to spend, it would either be on an SV, or the V-strom which is built on the same powerplant.
 
#9 ·
My thoughts....



Unless you just must have all that power I'd stay with the CX line. Relative simplicity of maintenance/repair, pretty good parts availability and so on. One somewhat reliable indicator of parts availability is to take whatever model of bike you like and see what's for sale on eBay and at what cost. If there is not much there, well it makes you wonder why.





A friend bought a 4 cyl '86 Nighthawk several years ago (750cc I think) and it is a very nice and powerful ride. But if he has to do any repair or serious maintenance it's going to be a costly nightmare. He is also the sort that thrashes his rides and fixes them only when they break. For him it will likely be 3 or 4 years of great fun and then the bike will rot in his barn. Although he has the ability I can never see him, for instance, rebuilding four carbs and doing a proper job.



Hoppy
 
#14 ·
I know Rickbert. I'm keeping an eye on your craigslist add. Your bike is the standard that I am judging all others by. Maybe I should take the wife over to your house and look at your beauty.
 
#15 ·
Yep John,



You're welcome to do that anytime.....you do what's right for YOU though not me or anyone else !!



If you DO want another CX and would like a "Custom" I don't think there's a better one out there than mine as there's really nothing left to do in restoring it...she's all done.



There for sure are others that run as good as mine does, but not any better. I think running good is a standard with these but I know there's not one that LOOKS as good as mine does. (In my biased opinion of course).
 
#16 ·
Rickbert's would be a good buy in my opinion. It is a known quantity and worth what he is asking for it... All that polishing makes it perty...
Image




The CB550 with a CB650 cam is quite fun and doesn't have the flat spot in acceleration that the CB550 has. You do have 4 carbs to tune and cam chains to replace about every 40Kmiles to be safe. Most any older bike will eat a few crackers, that's why most guys who own vintage bikes or classic bikes will own more than one. That way, hopefully one will always be in running form.

Fortunately, or unfortunately, the CX get to be pretty reliable when sorted out and maintained...making them boring. So you just have to buy another and breath life into it and then sell the one you like least to buy another...

It a journey like life...best spent on two feet or two wheels.



David